Vedas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Veda" and "Vedic" redirect here. For other uses, see Veda (disambiguation) and Vedic (disambiguation).
Part of a series on
Hindu scriptures and texts
Om symbol
Related Hindu texts
The Vedas are ancient Sanskrit texts of Hinduism. Above: A page from the Atharvaveda.

The Vedas (/ˈveɪdəz, ˈviː-/; [1] Sanskrit: वेद veda, "knowledge") are a large body of religious texts originating in ancient India. Composed in Vedic Sanskrit, the texts constitute the oldest layer of Sanskrit literature and the oldest scriptures of Hinduism. [2] [3]

There are four Vedas: the Rigveda, the Yajurveda, the Samaveda and the Atharvaveda. [4] [5] Each Veda has four subdivisions – the Samhitas (mantras and benedictions), the Aranyakas (text on rituals, ceremonies, sacrifices and symbolic-sacrifices), the Brahmanas (commentaries on rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices), and the Upanishads (texts discussing meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge). [4] [6] [7] Some scholars add a fifth category – the Upasanas (worship). [8] [9] Despite their differences, just like the texts of the śramaṇa traditions, the layers of texts in the Vedas discuss similar ideas and concepts. [10]

Vedas are śruti "what is heard"), [11] distinguishing them from other religious texts, which are called smṛti ("what is remembered"). Hindus consider the Vedas to be apauruṣeya, which means "not of a man, superhuman" [web 1] and "impersonal, authorless," [12] [13] [14] revelations of sacred sounds and texts heard by ancient sages after intense meditation. [15] [16]

The Vedas have been orally transmitted since the 2nd millennium BCE with the help of elaborate mnemonic techniques. [17] [18] [19] The mantras, the oldest part of the Vedas, are recited in the modern age for their phonology rather than the semantics, and are considered to be "primordial rhythms of creation", preceding the forms to which they refer. [20] By reciting them the cosmos is regenerated, "by enlivening and nourishing the forms of creation at their base." [20]

The various Indian philosophies and Hindu denominations have taken differing positions on the Vedas; schools of Indian philosophy which acknowledge the primal authority of the Vedas are classified as "orthodox" (āstika). [note 1] Other śramaṇa traditions, such as Lokayata, Carvaka, Ajivika, Buddhism and Jainism, which did not regard the Vedas as authorities, are referred to as "heterodox" or "non-orthodox" (nāstika) schools. [10] [web 2]

Etymology and usage

The Sanskrit word véda "knowledge, wisdom" is derived from the root vid- "to know". This is reconstructed as being derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *u̯eid-, meaning "see" or "know." [27]

The noun is from Proto-Indo-European *u̯eidos, cognate to Greek (ϝ)εἶδος "aspect", "form" . This is not to be confused with the homonymous 1st and 3rd person singular perfect tense véda, cognate to Greek (ϝ)οἶδα (w)oida "I know". Root cognates are Greek ἰδέα, English wit, etc., Latin videō "I see", German wissen "to know" etc. [28]

The Sanskrit term veda as a common noun means "knowledge". [29] The term in some contexts, such as hymn 10.93.11 of the Rigveda, means "obtaining or finding wealth, property", [30] while in some others it means "a bunch of grass together" as in a broom or for ritual fire. [31]

Vedas are called Maṛai or Vaymoli in parts of South India. Marai literally means "hidden, a secret, mystery". But the Tamil Naan Marai mentioned in Tholkappiam isn't Sanskrit Vedas. [32] [33] In some parts of south India (e.g. the Iyengar communities), the word veda is used in the Tamil writings of the Alvar saints. Such writings include the Divya Prabandham (aka Tiruvaymoli). [34]

Vedic texts

Rigveda manuscript in Devanagari

Vedic Sanskrit corpus

The term "Vedic texts" is used in two distinct meanings:

  1. Texts composed in Vedic Sanskrit during the Vedic period (Iron Age India)
  2. Any text considered as "connected to the Vedas" or a "corollary of the Vedas" [35]

The corpus of Vedic Sanskrit texts includes:

  • The Samhitas (Sanskrit saṃhitā, "collection"), are collections of metric texts ("mantras"). There are four "Vedic" Samhitas: the Rig-Veda, Sama-Veda, Yajur-Veda, and Atharva-Veda, most of which are available in several recensions (śākhā). In some contexts, the term Veda is used to refer only to these Samhitas, the collection of mantras. This is the oldest layer of Vedic texts, which were composed between circa 1500-1200 BCE (Rig Veda book 2-9), [note 1] and 1200-900 BCE for the other Samhitas. The complete corpus of Vedic mantras as collected in Bloomfield's Vedic Concordance (1907) consists of some 89,000 padas (metrical feet), of which 72,000 occur in the four Samhitas. [36]
  • The Brahmanas are prose texts that comment and explain the solemn rituals as well as expound on their meaning and many connected themes. Each of the Brahmanas is associated with one of the Samhitas or its recensions. [37] [38] The oldest dated to about 900 BCE, while the youngest Brahmanas (such as the Shatapatha Brahmana), were complete by about 700 BCE. [39] [40] The Brahmanas may either form separate texts or can be partly integrated into the text of the Samhitas. They may also include the Aranyakas and Upanishads.
  • The Aranyakas, "wilderness texts" or "forest treaties", were composed by people who meditated in the woods as recluses and are the third part of the Vedas. The texts contain discussions and interpretations of ceremonies, from ritualistic to symbolic meta-ritualistic points of view. [41] It is frequently read in secondary literature.
  • Older Mukhya Upanishads (Bṛhadāraṇyaka, Chandogya, Kaṭha, Kena, Aitareya, and others), [42] [43] composed between 800 BCE and the end of the Vedic period. [44] The Upanishads are largely philosophical works, some in dialogue form. They are the foundation of Hindu philosophical thought and its diverse traditions. [45] [46] Of the Vedic corpus, they alone are widely known, and the central ideas of the Upanishads are at the spiritual core of Hindus. [45] [47]
  • The texts considered "Vedic" in the sense of "corollaries of the Vedas" is less clearly defined, and may include numerous post-Vedic texts such as the later Upanishads and the Sutra literature, such as Shrauta Sutras and Gryha Sutras, which are smriti texts. Together, the Vedas and these Sutras form part of the Vedic Sanskrit corpus. [43] [note 3] [note 4]

While production of Brahmanas and Aranyakas ceased with the end of the Vedic period, additional Upanishads were composed after the end of the Vedic period. [48] The Brahmanas, Aranyakas, and Upanishads, among other things, interpret and discuss the Samhitas in philosophical and metaphorical ways to explore abstract concepts such as the Absolute (Brahman), and the soul or the self (Atman), introducing Vedanta philosophy, one of the major trends of later Hinduism. In other parts, they show evolution of ideas, such as from actual sacrifice to symbolic sacrifice, and of spirituality in the Upanishads. This has inspired later Hindu scholars such as Adi Shankara to classify each Veda into karma-kanda (कर्म खण्ड, action/ritual-related sections) and jnana-kanda (ज्ञान खण्ड, knowledge/spirituality-related sections). [8] [49]

Śruti and smriti

Vedas are śruti "what is heard"), [50] distinguishing them from other religious texts, which are called smṛti ("what is remembered"). This indigenous system of categorization was adopted by Max Müller and, while it is subject to some debate, it is still widely used. As Axel Michaels explains:

These classifications are often not tenable for linguistic and formal reasons: There is not only one collection at any one time, but rather several handed down in separate Vedic schools; Upanişads [...] are sometimes not to be distinguished from Āraṇyakas [...]; Brāhmaṇas contain older strata of language attributed to the Saṃhitās; there are various dialects and locally prominent traditions of the Vedic schools. Nevertheless, it is advisable to stick to the division adopted by Max Müller because it follows the Indian tradition, conveys the historical sequence fairly accurately, and underlies the current editions, translations, and monographs on Vedic literature." [42]

Authorship

Hindus consider the Vedas to be apauruṣeya, which means "not of a man, superhuman" [web 1] and "impersonal, authorless." [12] [13] [14] The Veda, for orthodox Indian theologians, are considered revelations seen by ancient sages after intense meditation, and texts that have been more carefully preserved since ancient times. [15] [16] In the Hindu Epic Mahabharata, the creation of Vedas is credited to Brahma. [51] The Vedic hymns themselves assert that they were skillfully created by Rishis (sages), after inspired creativity, just as a carpenter builds a chariot. [16] [note 5]

The oldest part of the Rig Veda Samhitas was orally composed in eastern Afghanistan [17] and north-western India (Punjab) between c. 1500 and 1200 BC, [note 1] where the Indo-Aryans first entered India, [53] while book 10 of the Rig Veda, and the other Samhitas were composed between 1200-900 BCE more eastward, between the Yamuna and the Ganges, the heartland of Aryavarta and the Kuru Kingdom (c. 1200 – c. 900 BCE). [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] The "circum-Vedic" texts, as well as the redaction of the Samhitas, date to c. 1000–500 BCE.

According to tradition, Vyasa is the compiler of the Vedas, who arranged the four kinds of mantras into four Samhitas (Collections). [54] [55]

Chronology and transmission

Main article: Vedic period

The Vedas are among the oldest sacred texts. [56] [57] The oldest part of the Rigveda Samhita was composed in the northwestern region (Punjab) of the Indian subcontinent, most likely between c. 1500 and 1200 BC, [19] [18] [58] although a wider approximation of c. 1700–1100 BC has also been given. [59] [60] [note 1] The "circum-Vedic" texts, as well as the redaction of the Samhitas, date to c. 1000–500 BCE, resulting in a Vedic period, spanning the mid 2nd to mid 1st millennium BCE, or the Late Bronze Age and the Iron Age. [note 6] The Vedic period reaches its peak only after the composition of the mantra texts, with the establishment of the various shakhas all over Northern India which annotated the mantra samhitas with Brahmana discussions of their meaning, and reaches its end in the age of Buddha and Panini and the rise of the Mahajanapadas (archaeologically, Northern Black Polished Ware). Michael Witzel gives a time span of c. 1500 to c. 500–400 BCE. Witzel makes special reference to the Near Eastern Mitanni material of the 14th century BCE, the only epigraphic record of Indo-Aryan contemporary to the Rigvedic period. He gives 150 BCE (Patañjali) as a terminus ante quem for all Vedic Sanskrit literature, and 1200 BCE (the early Iron Age) as terminus post quem for the Atharvaveda. [63]

The Vedas were orally transmitted since their composition in the Vedic period for several millennia. [64] [23] [65] The authoritative transmission [66] of the Vedas is by an oral tradition in a sampradaya from father to son or from teacher (guru) to student (shishya), [65] [67] [24] [68] [23] believed to be initiated by the Vedic rishis who heard the primordial sounds.[69] Only this tradition, embodied by a living teacher, can teach the correct pronounciation of the sounds and explain hidden meanings, in a way the "dead and entombed manuscript" cannot do. [67] [note 7] As Leela Prasad states, "According to Shankara, the "correct tradition" (sampradaya) has as much authority as the written Shastra," explaining that the tradition "bears the authority to clarify and provide direction in the application of knowledge." [70]

The emphasis in this transmission [note 8] is on the "proper articulation and pronunciation of the Vedic sounds," as prescribed in the Shiksha, [72] the Vedanga (Vedic study) of soundas uttered in a Vedic recitation, [73] [74] mastering the texts "literally forward and backward in fully acoustic fashion." [75] Houben and Rath note that the Vedic textual tradition cannot simply be characterized as oral, "since it also depends significantly on a memory culture." [76] The Vedas were preserved with precision with the help of elaborate mnemonic techniques, [23] [24] [25] such as memorizing the texts in eleven different modes of recitation (pathas), [66] using the alphabet as a mnemotechnical device, [77] [78] [note 9] "matching physical movements (such as nodding the head)[disputed – discuss] with particular sounds and chanting in a group"[79] and visualizing sounds by using mudras (hand signs). [80] This provided an additional visual confirmation, and also an alternate means to check the reading integrity by the audience, in addition to the audible means. [81] Houben and Rath note that a strong "memory culture" existed in ancient India when texts were transmitted orally, before the advent of writing in the early first millennium CE. [78] According to Staal, criticising the Goody-Watt hypothesis "according to which literacy is more reliable than orality," [82] this tradition of oral transmission "is closely related to Indian forms of science," and "by far the more remarkable" than the relatively recent tradition of written transmission. [note 10]

Holdrege and other Indologists [85] have noted that in the transmission of the Samhitas the emphasis is on the phonology of the sounds (śabda) and not on the meaning (artha) of the mantras. [85] [86] [67] Already at the end of the Vedic period their original meaning had become obscure for "ordinary people," [86] [note 11] and niruktas, etymological compendia, were developed to preserve and clarify the original meaning of many Sanskrit words. [86] [87] According to Staal, as referenced by Holdrege, though the mantras may have a discursive meaning, when the mantras are recited in the Vedic rituals "they are disengaged from their original context and are employed in ways that have little or nothing to do with their meaning." [85] [note 12] The words of the mantras are "themselves sacred," [88] and "do not constitute linguistic utterances." [26] Instead, as Klostermaier notes, in their application in Vedic rituals they become magical sounds, "means to an end." [note 13] Holdrege notes that there are scarce commentaries on the meaning of the mantras, in contrast to the number of commentaries on the Brahmanas and Upanishads, but states that the lack of emphasis on the "discursive meaning does not necessarily imply that they are meaningless." [89] In the Brahmanical perspective, the sounds have their own meaning, mantras are considered as "primordial rhythms of creation", preceding the forms to which they refer. [26] By reciting them the cosmos is regenerated, "by enlivening and nourishing the forms of creation at their base. As long as the purity of the sounds is preserved, the recitation of the mantras will be efficacious, irrespective of whether their discursive meaning is understood by human beings." [26]

A literary tradition is traceable in post-Vedic times, after the rise of Buddhism in the Maurya period, [note 14] perhaps earliest in the Kanva recension of the Yajurveda about the 1st century BCE; however oral tradition of transmission remained active. [64] Jack Goody has argued for an earlier literary tradition, concluding that the Vedas bear hallmarks of a literate culture along with oral transmission, [91] [92] but Goody's views have been strongly criticised by Falk, Lopez Jr,. and Staal, though they have also found some support. [93] [94]

The Vedas were written down only after 500 BCE, [95] [64] [23] but only the orally transmitted texts are regarded as authoritative, given the emphasis on the exact pronunciation of the sounds. [66] Witzel suggests that attempts to write down the Vedic texts towards the end of 1st millennium BCE were unsuccesfull, resulting in smriti rules explicitly forbidding the writing down of the Vedas. [64] Due to the ephemeral nature of the manuscript material (birch bark or palm leaves), surviving manuscripts rarely surpass an age of a few hundred years. [96] The Sampurnanand Sanskrit University has a Rigveda manuscript from the 14th century; [97] however, there are a number of older Veda manuscripts in Nepal that are dated from the 11th century onwards. [98]

The Vedas, Vedic rituals and its ancillary sciences called the Vedangas, were part of the curriculum at ancient universities such as at Taxila, Nalanda and Vikramashila. [99] [100] [101] [102] Mookerji refers to the ideal Vedic learning as described by the Sanskrit grammarian Yāska (4th c. BCE) and the Sanskrit scholar Sayana (14th c. CE). [103] According to Mookerji, "The ideal of this learning was thus the realization of Truth, and not mere mastery or recitation of its texts," [104] quoting Sayana, who states that "Veda is useless learning to him (for one) who only recites its without comprehending its meaning," not achieving the knowledge of paramatman. [104] Mookerji also refers to the Uśanā smriti, which "states that mastery of mere text of Veda is to be followed up by its meaning" by discussing the Vedanta. [105] Students had to practice vows (vrata), interpreted by Yāska as a vow of silence and meditation, [104] to which Mookerji adds obedience, [105] to realize the truths mediated by the texts. [106] These truths are dharma and para Brahman, realizing parabrahma-jnana, "realization of the highest truths called rta and satya." [107] According to Yāska, the students then became "'seers' of Truth" who themselves could teach others. [104]

Mookerji mentions several lists of the steps followed in Vedic education, one of them coming from Vācaspati Miśra (9th or 10th c. CE), who states that the five aspects of Vedic study are "hearing of words" (adhyanana); "apprehension of meaning of word"s (sabda); "reasoning leading to generalization" (uha); "confirmation by friend of teacher" (suhritprapti); and "application" (dana). [105]

Vedic schools or recensions

Main article: Shakha

The four Vedas were transmitted in various śākhās (branches, schools). [108] [109] Each school likely represented an ancient community of a particular area, or kingdom. [109] Each school followed its own canon. Multiple recensions are known for each of the Vedas. [108] Thus, states Witzel as well as Renou, in the 2nd millennium BCE, there was likely no canon of one broadly accepted Vedic texts, no Vedic “Scripture”, but only a canon of various texts accepted by each school. Some of these texts have survived, most lost or yet to be found. Rigveda that survives in modern times, for example, is in only one extremely well preserved school of Śåkalya, from a region called Videha, in modern north Bihar, south of Nepal. [110] The Vedic canon in its entirety consists of texts from all the various Vedic schools taken together. [109]

Each of the four Vedas were shared by the numerous schools, but revised, interpolated and adapted locally, in and after the Vedic period, giving rise to various recensions of the text. Some texts were revised into the modern era, raising significant debate on parts of the text which are believed to have been corrupted at a later date. [111] [112] The Vedas each have an Index or Anukramani, the principal work of this kind being the general Index or Sarvānukramaṇī. [113] [114]

Prodigious energy was expended by ancient Indian culture in ensuring that these texts were transmitted from generation to generation with inordinate fidelity. [115] For example, memorization of the sacred Vedas included up to eleven forms of recitation of the same text. The texts were subsequently "proof-read" by comparing the different recited versions. Forms of recitation included the jaṭā-pāṭha (literally "mesh recitation") in which every two adjacent words in the text were first recited in their original order, then repeated in the reverse order, and finally repeated in the original order. [116] That these methods have been effective, is attested to by the preservation of the most ancient Indian religious text, the Rigveda, as redacted into a single text during the Brahmana period, without any variant readings within that school. [116]

The Vedas were likely written down for the first time around 500 BCE. [95] However, all printed editions of the Vedas that survive in the modern times are likely the version existing in about the 16th century AD. [117]

Four Vedas

Part of a series on Hindu scriptures
Vedas and their Shakhas
Om
Hinduism portal

The canonical division of the Vedas is fourfold (turīya) viz., [118]

  1. Rigveda (RV)
  2. Yajurveda (YV, with the main division TS vs. VS)
  3. Samaveda (SV)
  4. Atharvaveda (AV)

Of these, the first three were the principal original division, also called "trayī vidyā"; that is, "the triple science" of reciting hymns (Rigveda), performing sacrifices (Yajurveda), and chanting songs (Samaveda). [119] [120] The Rigveda is the oldest work, which Witzel states are probably from the period of 1900 to 1100 BCE. Witzel, also notes that it is the Vedic period itself, where incipient lists divide the Vedic texts into three (trayī) or four branches: Rig, Yajur, Sama and Atharva. [109]

Each Veda has been subclassified into four major text types – the Samhitas (mantras and benedictions), the Aranyakas (text on rituals, ceremonies such as newborn baby's rites of passage, coming of age, marriages, retirement and cremation, sacrifices and symbolic sacrifices), the Brahmanas (commentaries on rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices), and the Upanishads (text discussing meditation, philosophy and spiritual knowledge). [4] [6] [7] The Upasanas (short ritual worship-related sections) are considered by some scholars [8] [9] as the fifth part. Witzel notes that the rituals, rites and ceremonies described in these ancient texts reconstruct to a large degree the Indo-European marriage rituals observed in a region spanning the Indian subcontinent, Persia and the European area, and some greater details are found in the Vedic era texts such as the Grhya Sūtras. [121]

Only one version of the Rigveda is known to have survived into the modern era. [110] Several different versions of the Sama Veda and the Atharva Veda are known, and many different versions of the Yajur Veda have been found in different parts of South Asia. [122]

Despite their differences, just like the texts of the śramaṇa traditions, the layers of texts in the Vedas discuss similar ideas and concepts. [10]

Rigveda

Main article: Rigveda
Nasadiya Sukta (Hymn of non-Eternity):

Who really knows?
Who can here proclaim it?
Whence, whence this creation sprang?
Gods came later, after the creation of this universe.

Who then knows whence it has arisen?
Whether God's will created it, or whether He was mute;
Only He who is its overseer in highest heaven knows,

He only knows, or perhaps He does not know.

—Rig Veda 10.129.6–7 [123]

The Rigveda Samhita is the oldest extant Indic text. [124] It is a collection of 1,028 Vedic Sanskrit hymns and 10,600 verses in all, organized into ten books (Sanskrit: mandalas). [125] The hymns are dedicated to Rigvedic deities. [126]

The books were composed by poets from different priestly groups over a period of several centuries between c. 1500 and 1200 BC, [note 1] (the early Vedic period) starting with the Punjab (Sapta Sindhu) region of the northwest Indian subcontinent. The Rigveda is structured based on clear principles – the Veda begins with a small book addressed to Agni, Indra, Soma and other gods, all arranged according to decreasing total number of hymns in each deity collection; for each deity series, the hymns progress from longer to shorter ones, but the number of hymns per book increases. Finally, the meter too is systematically arranged from jagati and tristubh to anustubh and gayatri as the text progresses. [109] In terms of substance, the nature of hymns shift from praise of deities in early books to Nasadiya Sukta with questions such as, "what is the origin of the universe?, do even gods know the answer?", [123] the virtue of Dāna (charity) in society, [127] and other metaphysical issues in its hymns. [128]

There are similarities between the mythology, rituals and linguistics in Rigveda and those found in ancient central Asia, Iranian and Hindukush (Afghanistan) regions. [129]

Samaveda

Main article: Samaveda

The Samaveda Samhita [130] consists of 1549 stanzas, taken almost entirely (except for 75 mantras) from the Rigveda. [42] [131] While its earliest parts are believed to date from as early as the Rigvedic period, the existing compilation dates from the post-Rigvedic Mantra period of Vedic Sanskrit, c. 1200 or 1000 BCE, roughly contemporary with the Atharvaveda and the Yajurveda. [131]

The Samaveda samhita has two major parts. The first part includes four melody collections (gāna, गान) and the second part three verse “books” (ārcika, आर्चिक). [131] A melody in the song books corresponds to a verse in the arcika books. Just as in the Rigveda, the early sections of Samaveda typically begin with hymns to Agni and Indra but shift to the abstract. Their meters shift also in a descending order. The songs in the later sections of the Samaveda have the least deviation from the hymns derived from the Rigveda. [131]

In the Samaveda, some of the Rigvedic verses are repeated. [132] Including repetitions, there are a total of 1875 verses numbered in the Samaveda recension translated by Griffith. [133] Two major recensions have survived, the Kauthuma/Ranayaniya and the Jaiminiya. Its purpose was liturgical, and they were the repertoire of the udgātṛ or "singer" priests. [134]

Yajurveda

Main article: Yajurveda

The Yajurveda Samhita consists of prose mantras. [135] It is a compilation of ritual offering formulas that were said by a priest while an individual performed ritual actions such as those before the yajna fire. [135] The core text of the Yajurveda falls within the classical Mantra period of Vedic Sanskrit at the end of the 2nd millennium BCE - younger than the Rigveda, and roughly contemporary with the Atharvaveda, the Rigvedic Khilani, and the Sāmaveda. [136] The scholarly consensus dates the bulk of the Yajurveda and Atharvaveda hymns to the early Indian Iron Age, c. 1200 or 1000 BC, [137] corresponding to the early Kuru Kingdom. [138]

A page from the Taittiriya Samhita, a layer of text within the Yajurveda

The earliest and most ancient layer of Yajurveda samhita includes about 1,875 verses, that are distinct yet borrow and build upon the foundation of verses in Rigveda. [139] Unlike the Samaveda which is almost entirely based on Rigveda mantras and structured as songs, the Yajurveda samhitas are in prose and linguistically, they are different from earlier Vedic texts. [140] The Yajur Veda has been the primary source of information about sacrifices during Vedic times and associated rituals. [141]

There are two major groups of texts in this Veda: the "Black" (Krishna) and the "White" (Shukla). The term "black" implies "the un-arranged, motley collection" of verses in Yajurveda, in contrast to the "white" (well arranged) Yajurveda. [142] The White Yajurveda separates the Samhita from its Brahmana (the Shatapatha Brahmana), the Black Yajurveda intersperses the Samhita with Brahmana commentary. Of the Black Yajurveda, texts from four major schools have survived (Maitrayani, Katha, Kapisthala-Katha, Taittiriya), while of the White Yajurveda, two (Kanva and Madhyandina). [143] [144] The youngest layer of Yajurveda text is not related to rituals nor sacrifice, it includes the largest collection of primary Upanishads, influential to various schools of Hindu philosophy. [145] [146]

Atharvaveda

Main article: Atharvaveda

The Artharvaveda Samhita is the text 'belonging to the Atharvan and Angirasa poets. It has about 760 hymns, and about 160 of the hymns are in common with the Rigveda. [147] Most of the verses are metrical, but some sections are in prose. [147] Two different versions of the text – the Paippalāda and the Śaunakīya – have survived into the modern times. [147] [148] The Atharvaveda was not considered as a Veda in the Vedic era, and was accepted as a Veda in late 1st millennium BCE. [149] [150] It was compiled last, [151] probably around 900 BCE, although some of its material may go back to the time of the Rigveda, [152] or earlier. [147]

The Atharvaveda is sometimes called the "Veda of magical formulas", [153] an epithet declared to be incorrect by other scholars. [154] The Samhita layer of the text likely represents a developing 2nd millennium BCE tradition of magico-religious rites to address superstitious anxiety, spells to remove maladies believed to be caused by demons, and herbs- and nature-derived potions as medicine. [155] [156] The text, states Kenneth Zysk, is one of oldest surviving record of the evolutionary practices in religious medicine and reveals the "earliest forms of folk healing of Indo-European antiquity". [157] Many books of the Atharvaveda Samhita are dedicated to rituals without magic, such as to philosophical speculations and to theosophy. [154]

The Atharva veda has been a primary source for information about Vedic culture, the customs and beliefs, the aspirations and frustrations of everyday Vedic life, as well as those associated with kings and governance. The text also includes hymns dealing with the two major rituals of passage – marriage and cremation. The Atharva Veda also dedicates significant portion of the text asking the meaning of a ritual. [158]

Embedded Vedic texts

Manuscripts of the Vedas are in the Sanskrit language, but in many regional scripts in addition to the Devanagari. Top: Grantha script (Tamil Nadu), Below: Malayalam script (Kerala).

Brahmanas

Further information: Brahmanas

The Brahmanas are commentaries, explanation of proper methods and meaning of Vedic Samhita rituals in the four Vedas. [37] They also incorporate myths, legends and in some cases philosophy. [37] [38] Each regional Vedic shakha (school) has its own operating manual-like Brahmana text, most of which have been lost. [159] A total of 19 Brahmana texts have survived into modern times: two associated with the Rigveda, six with the Yajurveda, ten with the Samaveda and one with the Atharvaveda. The oldest dated to about 900 BCE, while the youngest Brahmanas (such as the Shatapatha Brahmana), were complete by about 700 BCE. [39] [40] According to Jan Gonda, the final codification of the Brahmanas took place in pre-Buddhist times (ca. 600 BCE). [160]

The substance of the Brahmana text varies with each Veda. For example, the first chapter of the Chandogya Brahmana, one of the oldest Brahmanas, includes eight ritual suktas (hymns) for the ceremony of marriage and rituals at the birth of a child. [161] [162] The first hymn is a recitation that accompanies offering a Yajna oblation to Agni (fire) on the occasion of a marriage, and the hymn prays for prosperity of the couple getting married. [161] [163] The second hymn wishes for their long life, kind relatives, and a numerous progeny. [161] The third hymn is a mutual marriage pledge, between the bride and groom, by which the two bind themselves to each other. The sixth through last hymns of the first chapter in Chandogya Brahmana are ritual celebrations on the birth of a child and wishes for health, wealth, and prosperity with a profusion of cows and artha. [161] However, these verses are incomplete expositions, and their complete context emerges only with the Samhita layer of text. [164]

Aranyakas and Upanishads

Further information: Vedanta, Upanishads, and Aranyakas

The Aranyakas layer of the Vedas include rituals, discussion of symbolic meta-rituals, as well as philosophical speculations. [9] [41]

Aranyakas, however, neither are homogeneous in content nor in structure. [41] They are a medley of instructions and ideas, and some include chapters of Upanishads within them. Two theories have been proposed on the origin of the word Aranyakas. One theory holds that these texts were meant to be studied in a forest, while the other holds that the name came from these being the manuals of allegorical interpretation of sacrifices, for those in Vanaprastha (retired, forest-dwelling) stage of their life, according to the historic age-based Ashrama system of human life. [165]

The Upanishads reflect the last composed layer of texts in the Vedas. They are commonly referred to as Vedānta, variously interpreted to mean either the "last chapters, parts of the Vedas" or "the object, the highest purpose of the Veda". [166] The concepts of Brahman (Ultimate Reality) and Ātman (Soul, Self) are central ideas in all the Upanishads, [167] [168] and "Know your Ātman" their thematic focus. [168] [169] The Upanishads are the foundation of Hindu philosophical thought and its diverse traditions. [45] [170] Of the Vedic corpus, they alone are widely known, and the central ideas of the Upanishads have influenced the diverse traditions of Hinduism. [45] [171]

Aranyakas are sometimes identified as karma-kanda (ritualistic section), while the Upanishads are identified as jnana-kanda (spirituality section). [8] [172] In an alternate classification, the early part of Vedas are called Samhitas and the commentary are called the Brahmanas which together are identified as the ceremonial karma-kanda, while Aranyakas and Upanishads are referred to as the jnana-kanda. [173]

Post-Vedic literature

Vedanga

Main article: Vedanga

The Vedangas developed towards the end of the vedic period, around or after the middle of the 1st millennium BCE. These auxiliary fields of Vedic studies emerged because the language of the Vedas, composed centuries earlier, became too archaic to the people of that time. [174] The Vedangas were sciences that focused on helping understand and interpret the Vedas that had been composed many centuries earlier. [174]

The six subjects of Vedanga are phonetics (Śikṣā), poetic meter (Chandas), grammar (Vyākaraṇa), etymology and linguistics (Nirukta), rituals and rites of passage (Kalpa), time keeping and astronomy (Jyotiṣa). [175] [176] [177]

Vedangas developed as ancillary studies for the Vedas, but its insights into meters, structure of sound and language, grammar, linguistic analysis and other subjects influenced post-Vedic studies, arts, culture and various schools of Hindu philosophy. [178] [179] [180] The Kalpa Vedanga studies, for example, gave rise to the Dharma-sutras, which later expanded into Dharma-shastras. [174] [181]

Parisista

Main article: Parisista

Pariśiṣṭa "supplement, appendix" is the term applied to various ancillary works of Vedic literature, dealing mainly with details of ritual and elaborations of the texts logically and chronologically prior to them: the Samhitas, Brahmanas, Aranyakas and Sutras. Naturally classified with the Veda to which each pertains, Parisista works exist for each of the four Vedas. However, only the literature associated with the Atharvaveda is extensive.

  • The Āśvalāyana Gṛhya Pariśiṣṭa is a very late text associated with the Rigveda canon.
  • The Gobhila Gṛhya Pariśiṣṭa is a short metrical text of two chapters, with 113 and 95 verses respectively.
  • The Kātiya Pariśiṣṭas, ascribed to Kātyāyana, consist of 18 works enumerated self-referentially in the fifth of the series (the Caraṇavyūha) and the Kātyāyana Śrauta Sūtra Pariśiṣṭa.
  • The Kṛṣṇa Yajurveda has 3 parisistas The Āpastamba Hautra Pariśiṣṭa, which is also found as the second praśna of the Satyasāḍha Śrauta Sūtra', the Vārāha Śrauta Sūtra Pariśiṣṭa
  • For the Atharvaveda, there are 79 works, collected as 72 distinctly named parisistas. [182]

Upaveda

The term upaveda ("applied knowledge") is used in traditional literature to designate the subjects of certain technical works. [183] [184] Lists of what subjects are included in this class differ among sources. The Charanavyuha mentions four Upavedas: [185]

  • Archery (Dhanurveda), associated with the Yajurveda
  • Architecture (Sthapatyaveda), associated with the RigVeda.
  • Music and sacred dance (Gāndharvaveda), associated with the Samaveda
  • Medicine (Āyurveda), associated with the Atharvaveda. [186] [187]

"Fifth" and other Vedas

Some post-Vedic texts, including the Mahabharata, the Natyasastra [188] and certain Puranas, refer to themselves as the "fifth Veda". [189] The earliest reference to such a "fifth Veda" is found in the Chandogya Upanishad in hymn 7.1.2. [190]

Let drama and dance (Nātya, नाट्य) be the fifth vedic scripture. Combined with an epic story, tending to virtue, wealth, joy and spiritual freedom, it must contain the significance of every scripture, and forward every art. Thus, from all the Vedas, Brahma framed the Nātya Veda. From the Rig Veda he drew forth the words, from the Sama Veda the melody, from the Yajur Veda gesture, and from the Atharva Veda the sentiment. — First chapter of Nātyaśāstra, Abhinaya Darpana [191] [192]

"Divya Prabandha", for example Tiruvaymoli, is a term for canonical Tamil texts considered as Vernacular Veda by some South Indian Hindus. [33] [34]

Other texts such as the Bhagavad Gita or the Vedanta Sutras are considered shruti or "Vedic" by some Hindu denominations but not universally within Hinduism. The Bhakti movement, and Gaudiya Vaishnavism in particular extended the term veda to include the Sanskrit Epics and Vaishnavite devotional texts such as the Pancaratra. [193]

Puranas

Main article: Puranas

The Puranas is a vast genre of encyclopedic Indian literature about a wide range of topics particularly myths, legends and other traditional lore. [194] Several of these texts are named after major Hindu deities such as Vishnu, Shiva and Devi. [195] [196] There are 18 Maha Puranas (Great Puranas) and 18 Upa Puranas (Minor Puranas), with over 400,000 verses. [194]

The Puranas have been influential in the Hindu culture. [197] [198] They are considered Vaidika (congruent with Vedic literature). [199] The Bhagavata Purana has been among the most celebrated and popular text in the Puranic genre, and is of non-dualistic tenor. [200] [201] The Puranic literature wove with the Bhakti movement in India, and both Dvaita and Advaita scholars have commented on the underlying Vedanta themes in the Maha Puranas. [202]

Authority of the Vedas

The various Hindu denominations and Indian philosophies have taken differing positions on the authority of the Vedas. Schools of Indian philosophy which acknowledge the authority of the Vedas are classified as "orthodox" (āstika). [note 16] Other śramaṇa traditions, such as Lokayata, Carvaka, Ajivika, Buddhism and Jainism, which did not regard the Vedas as authorities, are referred to as "heterodox" or "non-orthodox" (nāstika) schools. [10] [web 2]

Though many religious Hindus implicitly acknowledge the authority of the Vedas, this acknowledgment is often "no more than a declaration that someone considers himself [or herself] a Hindu," [204] [note 17] and "most Indians today pay lip service to the Veda and have no regard for the contents of the text." [205] Some Hindus challenge the authority of the Vedas, thereby implicitly acknowledging its importance to the history of Hinduism, states Lipner. [206]

Hindu reform movement such as Arya Samaj and Brahmo Samaj accepted the authority of Vedas, [207] while the authority of the Vedas has been rejected by Hindu modernists like Debendranath Tagore and Keshub Chandra Sen; [208] and also by social reformers like B. R. Ambedkar. [209]

Western Indology

Further information: Sanskrit studies

The study of Sanskrit in the West began in the 17th century. In the early 19th century, Arthur Schopenhauer drew attention to Vedic texts, specifically the Upanishads. The importance of Vedic Sanskrit for Indo-European studies was also recognized in the early 19th century. English translations of the Samhitas were published in the later 19th century, in the Sacred Books of the East series edited by Müller between 1879 and 1910. [210] Ralph T. H. Griffith also presented English translations of the four Samhitas, published 1889 to 1899.

Rigveda manuscripts were selected for inscription in UNESCO's Memory of the World Register in 2007. [211]

See also

Notes

  1. Elisa Freschi (2012): "The Vedas are not deontic authorities in absolute sense and may be disobeyed, but are recognized as a deontological epistemic authority by a Hindu orthodox school." [223] This differentiation between epistemic and deontic authority is true for all Indian religions.
  2. It is certain that the hymns of the Rig Veda post-date Indo-Iranian separation of ca. 2000 BC and probably that of the relevant Mitanni documents of c. 1400 BC. The oldest available text is estimated to be from 1200 BC. Philological estimates tend to date the bulk of the text to the second half of the second millennium:
    • Max Müller: "the hymns of the Rig-Veda are said to date from 1500 B.C." [61]
    • Thomas Oberlies (Die Religion des Rgveda, 1998, p. 158) based on 'cumulative evidence' sets a wide range of 1700–1100 BC. [59] Oberlies 1998, p. 155 gives an estimate of 1100 BC for the youngest hymns in book 10. [62]
    • The EIEC (s.v. Indo-Iranian languages, p. 306) gives 1500–1000 BC.
    • Flood and Witzel both mention c. 1500–1200 BC. [19] [18]
    • Anthony mentions c. 1500–1300 BC. [58]
  3. For a table of all Vedic texts see Witzel, Michael, "Vedas and Upaniṣads", in: Flood 2003, pp. 100–101.
  4. The Vedic Sanskrit corpus is incorporated in A Vedic Word Concordance (Vaidika-Padānukrama-Koṣa) prepared from 1930 under Vishva Bandhu, and published in five volumes in 1935–1965. Its scope extends to about 400 texts, including the entire Vedic Sanskrit corpus besides some "sub-Vedic" texts. Volume I: Samhitas, Volume II: Brahmanas and Aranyakas, Volume III: Upanishads, Volume IV: Vedangas; A revised edition, extending to about 1800 pages, was published in 1973–1976.
  5. Edward Roer (Translator), Shankara's Introduction at Google Books to Brihad Aranyaka Upanishad at pp. 1–5: "The Vedas are divided in two parts, the first is the karma-kanda, the ceremonial part, also (called) purva-kanda, and treats on ceremonies; the second part is the jnana kanda, the part which contains knowledge, also named uttara-kanda or posterior part, and unfolds the knowledge of Brahma or the universal soul."
  6. "As a skilled craftsman makes a car, a singer I, Mighty One! this hymn for thee have fashioned. If thou, O Agni, God, accept it gladly, may we obtain thereby the heavenly Waters". – Rigveda 5.2.11, Translated by Ralph T.H. Griffith [52]
  7. Gavin Flood sums up mainstream estimates, according to which the Rigveda was compiled from as early as 1500 BCE over a period of several centuries. [19]
  8. Broo 2016, p. 92 quotes Harold G. Coward and K. Kunjunni Raja.
  9. Of the complete Veda, by pāțha-śālā (priestly schools), as distinguished from the transmission in the pūjā, the daily services. [71]
  10. Several authors refer to the Chinese Buddhist Monk I-Tsing, who visited India in the 7th century to retrieve Buddhist texts and gave examples of mnemonic techniques used in India: [77] "In India there are two traditional ways in which one can attain great intellectual power. Firstly by repeatedly committing to memory the intellect is developed; secondly the alphabet fixes (to) one's ideas. By this way, after a practice of ten days or a month, a student feels his thoughts rise like a fountain, and can commit to memory whatever he has heard once." [78] [77]
  11. Staal: [this tradition of oral transmission is] "by far the more remarkable [than the relatively recent tradition of written transmission], not merely because it is characteristically Indian and unlike anything we find elsewhere, but also because it has led to scientific discoveries that are of enduring interest and from which the contemporary West still has much to learn." Schiffman (2012, p. 171), quoting Staal (1986, p. 27)
    Staal argued that the ancient Indian grammarians, especially Pāṇini, had completely mastered methods of linguistic theory not rediscovered again until the 1950s and the applications of modern mathematical logic to linguistics by Noam Chomsky. (Chomsky himself has said that the first generative grammar in the modern sense was Panini's grammar). [83] These early Indian methods allowed the construction of discrete, potentially infinite generative systems. Remarkably, these early linguistic systems were codified orally, though writing was then used to develop them in some way. The formal basis for Panini's methods involved the use of "auxiliary" markers, rediscovered in the 1930s by the logician Emil Post. [84]
  12. Artha may also mean "goal, purpose or essence," depending on the context. [124]
  13. Klostermaier 2007, p. 55: "Kautas, a teacher mentioned in the Nirukta by Yāska (ca. 500 BCE), a work devoted to an etymology of Vedic words that were no longer understood by ordinary people, held that the word of the Veda was no longer perceived as meaningful "normal" speech but as a fixed sequence of sounds, whose meaning was obscure beyond recovery."
  14. According to Holdrege, srotriyas (a group of male Brahmin reciters who are masters of sruti [66] ) "frequently do not understand what they recite" when reciting the Samhitas, merely preserving the sound of the text. [85]
  15. Klostermaier: "Brahman, derived from the root bŗh = to grow, to become great, was originally identical with the Vedic word, that makes people prosper: words were the pricipan means to approach the gods who dwelled in a different sphere. It was not a big step from this notion of "reified speech-act" to that "of the speech-act being looked at implicitly and explicitly as a means to an end." Klostermaier 2007, p. 55 quotes Madhav M. Deshpande (1990), Changing Conceptions of the Veda: From Speech-Acts to Magical Sounds, p.4.
  16. Coward 2008, p. 114: "For the Mimamsa the ultimate reality is nothing other than the eternal words of the Vedas. They did not accept the existence of a single supreme creator god, who might have composed the Veda. According to the Mimamsa, gods named in the Vedas have no existence apart from the mantras that speak their names. The power of the gods, then, is nothing other than the power of the mantras that name them."
  17. The early Buddhist texts are also generally believed to be of oral tradition, with the first Pali Canon written many centuries after the death of the Buddha. [90]
  18. Literally, "the meaning of the Vedas made manifest."
  19. Sayana repeats Yaska; see interpretation of the Vedas.
  20. The Upanishads. [45]
  21. Mookerji also refers to the Uśanā smriti (81-2), which "states that mastery of mere text of Veda is to be followed up by its meaning" by discussing the Vedanta. [128] where-after they were able to engage in doscourses on the Vedas. [129] [94]
  22. For example, Hymn 1.164.34, "What is the ultimate limit of the earth?", "What is the center of the universe?", "What is the semen of the cosmic horse?", "What is the ultimate source of human speech?" Hymn 1.164.34, "Who gave blood, soul, spirit to the earth?", "How could the unstructured universe give origin to this structured world?" Hymn 1.164.5, "Where does the sun hide in the night?", "Where do gods live?" Hymn 1.164.6, "What, where is the unborn support for the born universe?"; Hymn 1.164.20 (a hymn that is widely cited in the Upanishads as the parable of the Body and the Soul): "Two birds with fair wings, inseparable companions; Have found refuge in the same sheltering tree. One incessantly eats from the fig tree; the other, not eating, just looks on.";
    Sources: (a) Antonio de Nicholas (2003), Meditations Through the Rig Veda: Four-Dimensional Man, ISBN 978-0595269259 , pp. 64–69;
    Jan Gonda , A History of Indian Literature: Veda and Upanishads, Volume 1, Part 1, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3447016032 , pp. 134–135;
    Rigveda Book 1, Hymn 164 Wikisource
  23. Elisa Freschi (2012): "The Vedas are not deontic authorities in absolute sense and may be disobeyed, but are recognized as a deontological epistemic authority by a Hindu orthodox school." [223] This differentiation between epistemic and deontic authority is true for all Indian religions.
  24. Lipner quotes Brockington (1981), The sacred tread, p.5.

References

  1. "Veda" . Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary .
  2. see e.g. Radhakrishnan & Moore 1957 , p. 3; Witzel, Michael, "Vedas and Upaniṣads", in: Flood 2003 , p. 68; MacDonell 2004 , pp. 29–39; Sanskrit literature (2003) in Philip's Encyclopedia. Accessed 2007-08-09
  3. Sanujit Ghose (2011). "Religious Developments in Ancient India" in Ancient History Encyclopedia.
  4. Gavin Flood (1996), An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press,
    ISBN 978-0521438780 , pp. 35–39
  5. Bloomfield, M. The Atharvaveda and the Gopatha-Brahmana, (Grundriss der Indo-Arischen Philologie und Altertumskunde II.1.b.) Strassburg 1899; Gonda, J. A history of Indian literature: I.1 Vedic literature (Samhitas and Brahmanas); I.2 The Ritual Sutras. Wiesbaden 1975, 1977
  6. A Bhattacharya (2006), Hindu Dharma: Introduction to Scriptures and Theology,
    ISBN 978-0595384556 , pp. 8–14; George M. Williams (2003), Handbook of Hindu Mythology, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0195332612 , p. 285
  7. Jan Gonda (1975), Vedic Literature: (Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas), Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3447016032
  8. Bhattacharya 2006 , pp. 8–14.
  9. Barbara A. Holdrege (1995), Veda and Torah: Transcending the Textuality of Scripture, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0791416402 , pp. 351–357
  10. Flood 1996 , p. 82
  11. Apte 1965 , p. 887
  12. Sharma 2011 , p. 196–197.
  13. Westerhoff 2009 , p. 290.
  14. Todd 2013 , p. 128.
  15. Pollock 2011 , p. 41–58.
  16. Scharfe 2002 , p. 13–14.
  17. Wood 2007 .
  18. Hexam 2011 , p. chapter 8.
  19. Dwyer 2013 .
  20. Holdrege 1996 , p. 347.
  21. Monier-Williams 2006 , p. 1015; Apte 1965 , p. 856
  22. see e.g. Pokorny's 1959 Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch s.v. u̯(e)id-²; Rix' Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben , u̯ei̯d-.
  23. Monier-Williams, Monier (1899). A Sanskrit-English dictionary : etymologically and philologically arranged with special reference to cognate Indo-European languages . Oxford: Clarendon Press., p. 1015 .
  24. Monier-Williams, Monier (1899). A Sanskrit-English dictionary : etymologically and philologically arranged with special reference to cognate Indo-European languages . Oxford: Clarendon Press., p. 1017 (2nd Column)
  25. Monier-Williams, Monier (1899). A Sanskrit-English dictionary : etymologically and philologically arranged with special reference to cognate Indo-European languages Oxford: Clarendon Press., p. 1017 (3rd Column)
  26. Vasudha Narayanan (1994), The Vernacular Veda: Revelation, Recitation, and Ritual, University of South Carolina Press, ISBN 978-0872499652 , p. 194
  27. John Carman (1989), The Tamil Veda: Pillan's Interpretation of the Tiruvaymoli, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0226093055 , pp. 259–261
  28. Vasudha Narayanan (1994), The Vernacular Veda: Revelation, Recitation, and Ritual, University of South Carolina Press, ISBN 978-0872499652 , pp. 43, 117–119
  29. according to ISKCON , Hindu Sacred Texts , "Hindus themselves often use the term to describe anything connected to the Vedas and their corollaries (e.g. Vedic culture)."
  30. 37,575 are Rigvedic. Of the remaining, 34,857 appear in the other three Samhitas, and 16,405 are known only from Brahmanas, Upanishads or Sutras
  31. Klostermaier 1994 , p. 67–69.
  32. Brahmana Encyclopædia Britannica (2013)
  33. Michael Witzel , "Tracing the Vedic dialects" in Dialectes dans les litteratures Indo-Aryennes ed. Caillat, Paris, 1989, 97–265.
  34. Biswas et al (1989), Cosmic Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0521343541 , pp. 42–43
  35. Jan Gonda (1975), Vedic Literature: (Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas), Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3447016032 , pp. 424–426
  36. Michaels 2004 , p. 51.
  37. Witzel, Michael, "Vedas and Upaniṣads", in: Flood 2003 , p. 69.
  38. William K. Mahony (1998). The Artful Universe: An Introduction to the Vedic Religious Imagination . State University of New York Press. p. 271. ISBN 978-0-7914-3579-3 .
  39. Wendy Doniger (1990), Textual Sources for the Study of Hinduism, 1st Edition, University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0226618470 , pp. 2–3; Quote: "The Upanishads supply the basis of later Hindu philosophy; they alone of the Vedic corpus are widely known and quoted by most well-educated Hindus, and their central ideas have also become a part of the spiritual arsenal of rank-and-file Hindus."
  40. Wiman Dissanayake (1993), Self as Body in Asian Theory and Practice (Editors: Thomas P. Kasulis et al.), State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0791410806 , p. 39; Quote: "The Upanishads form the foundations of Hindu philosophical thought and the central theme of the Upanishads is the identity of Atman and Brahman, or the inner self and the cosmic self.";
    Michael McDowell and Nathan Brown (2009), World Religions, Penguin, ISBN 978-1592578467 , pp. 208–210
  41. Patrick Olivelle (2014), The Early Upanisads, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0195352429 , p. 3; Quote: "Even though theoretically the whole of vedic corpus is accepted as revealed truth [shruti], in reality it is the Upanishads that have continued to influence the life and thought of the various religious traditions that we have come to call Hindu. Upanishads are the scriptures par excellence of Hinduism".
  42. Flood 2003 , pp. 100–101
  43. Bartley 2001 , p. 490.
  44. Holdrege 1996 , p. 30.
  45. Nakamura 1983 , p. 409.
  46. Bhattacharya 2006 , pp. 9.
  47. Knapp 2005 , pp. 10–11.
  48. Apte 1965 , p. 887
  49. Seer of the Fifth Veda: Kr̥ṣṇa Dvaipāyana Vyāsa in the Mahābhārata Bruce M. Sullivan, Motilal Banarsidass, pp. 85–86
  50. "The Rig Veda/Mandala 5/Hymn 2" .
  51. Witzel 1995 , p. 4.
  52. Flood 1996 , p. 37.
  53. Anthony 2007 , p. 49.
  54. Witzel 2008 , p. 68.
  55. Frazier 2011 , p. 344.
  56. Holdrege 2012 , p. 249, 250.
  57. Dalal & 2014-04-15 .
  58. Dutt .
  59. Gomes 2012 , p. 54.
  60. Anthony 2007 , p. 454.
  61. Oberlies 1998 , p. 158.
  62. Kumar 2014 , p. 179.
  63. Müller 1892 .
  64. Oberlies 1998 , p. 155.
  65. Witzel, Michael, "Vedas and Upaniṣads", in: Flood 2003 , p. 68
  66. Witzel, Michael, "Vedas and Upaniṣads", in: Flood 2003 , p. 69; For oral composition and oral transmission for "many hundreds of years" before being written down, see: Avari 2007 , p. 76.
  67. Holdrege 1995 , p. 344.
  68. Holdrege 1996 , p. 345.
  69. Broo 2016 , p. 92.
  70. Pruthi 2004 , p. 286.
  71. Holdrege 2012 , p. 165.
  72. Prasad 2007 , p. 125.
  73. Wilke & Moebus 2011 , p. 344-345.
  74. Wilke & Moebus 2011 , p. 345.
  75. Banerji 1989 , p. 323–324.
  76. Wilke & Moebus 2011 , pp. 477–495.
  77. Holdreg3 1996 , p. 345.
  78. Rath 2012 , p. 22.
  79. Griffiths 1999 , p. 122.
  80. Rath 2012 , p. 19.
  81. Doniger 2010 , p. 106.
  82. Annette Wilke & Oliver Moebus 2011 , p. 479.
  83. Wilke & Moebus 2011 , p. 479.
  84. Schiffman 2012 , p. 171.
  85. An event in Kolkata Archived May 10, 2012, at the Wayback Machine , Frontline
  86. Kadvany, John (2007). "Positional Value and Linguistic Recursion". Journal of Indian Philosophy. 35 (5–6): 487–520. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.565.2083 . doi : 10.1007/s10781-007-9025-5 .
  87. Galewicz 2004 , p. 328.
  88. Mookerji 2011 , p. 35.
  89. Holdrege 1996 , p. 346.
  90. Klostermaier 2007 , p. 55.
  91. Jackson 2016 , p. "Sayana, Vidyaranya’s brother".
  92. Holdrege 1996 , p. 346-347.
  93. Holdrege 1996 , p. 346,347.
  94. Frazier 2011 , p. 34.
  95. Donald S. Lopez Jr. (1995). "Authority and Orality in the Mahāyāna" (PDF). Numen. 42 (1): 21–47. doi : 10.1163/1568527952598800 . hdl : 2027.42/43799 . JSTOR 3270278 .
  96. Wilke, A and Moebus O (2011). Sound and communication : an aesthetic cultural history of Sanskrit Hinduism. Berlin ; New York: De Gruyter. p. 192.
  97. Goody 1987 .
  98. Lopez Jr. 2016 , p. 35-36.
  99. Olson & Cole 2013 , p. 15.
  100. Avari 2007 , pp. 69–70, 76
  101. Brodd, Jeffrey (2003), World Religions, Winona, MN: Saint Mary's Press, ISBN 978-0-88489-725-5 .
  102. Jamison, Stephanie W.; Brereton, Joel P. (2014). The Rigveda . vol. 1. Oxford University Press. p. 18. ISBN 978-0-19-972078-1 .
  103. "Cultural Heritage of Nepal" . Nepal-German Manuscript Preservation Project. University of Hamburg .Archived from the original on 18 September 2014. Retrieved 4 November 2014.
  104. Buswell & Lopez, Jr. 2013 .
  105. Frazier, Jessica, ed. (2011). The Continuum companion to Hindu studies . London: Continuum. p. 34 . ISBN 978-0-8264-9966-0 .
  106. Walton, Linda (2015). "Educational institutions" in The Cambridge World History Vol. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 122. ISBN 978-0-521-19074-9 .
  107. Sukumar Dutt (1988) [First published in 1962]. Buddhist Monks And Monasteries of India: Their History And Contribution To Indian Culture. George Allen and Unwin Ltd, London. ISBN 81-208-0498-8 . pp. 332–333
  108. Dashpande 1990 , p. 33.
  109. Misra 2000 , p. 49.
  110. Holdrege 1996 , p. 354.
  111. Jackson 2016 , ch.3.
  112. Coward 1990 , p. 106.
  113. Mookerji 2011 , p. 34.
  114. Mookerji 2011 , p. 30.
  115. Holdrege 1996 , p. 355, 356-357.
  116. Galewicz 2004 , p. 40.
  117. Galewicz 2011 , p. 338.
  118. Collins 2009 , "237 Sayana".
  119. Galewicz 2004 , p. 41
  120. Galewicz 2004 , p. 41-42.
  121. Michaels , p. 237–238.
  122. Mookerji 2011 , p. 29-31.
  123. Mookerji 2011 , p. 29, 34.
  124. See:
  125. Mookerji 2011 , p. 34-35.
  126. Mookerji 2011 , p. 35-36.
  127. Mookerji 2005 , p. 36.
  128. Mookerji 2011 , p. 196.
  129. Mookerji 2100 , p. 29.
  130. Flood 1996 , p. 39.
  131. Witzel, M., "The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools : The Social and Political Milieu" , Harvard University, in Witzel 1997 , pp. 261–264
  132. Jamison and Witzel (1992), Vedic Hinduism , Harvard University, p. 6
  133. J. Muir (1868), Original Sanskrit Texts on the Origin and History of the People of India – their religion and institutions at Google Books , 2nd Edition, p. 12
  134. Albert Friedrich Weber, Indische Studien, herausg. von at Google Books , Vol. 10, pp. 1–9 with footnotes (in German); For a translation, Original Sanskrit Texts at Google Books , p. 14
  135. For an example, see Sarvānukramaṇī Vivaraṇa Univ of Pennsylvania rare texts collection
  136. R̥gveda-sarvānukramaṇī Śaunakakr̥tāʼnuvākānukramaṇī ca, Maharṣi-Kātyayāna-viracitā, OCLC 11549595
  137. ( Staal 1986 )
  138. ( Filliozat 2004 , p. 139)
  139. Michael Witzel, "Vedas and Upaniṣads", in: Flood 2003 , p. 69, Quote: "... almost all printed editions depend on the late manuscripts that are hardly older than 500 years"
  140. Radhakrishnan & Moore 1957 , p. 3; Witzel, Michael, "Vedas and Upaniṣads", in: Flood 2003 , p. 68
  141. Witzel, M., " The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools : The Social and Political Milieu " in Witzel 1997 , pp. 257–348
  142. MacDonell 2004 , pp. 29–39
  143. Jamison and Witzel (1992), Vedic Hinduism , Harvard University, p. 21
  144. Witzel, M., " The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools : The Social and Political Milieu " in Witzel 1997 , p. 286
  146. see e.g. Avari 2007 , p. 77.
  147. For 1,028 hymns and 10,600 verses and division into ten mandalas, see: Avari 2007 , p. 77.
  148. For characterization of content and mentions of deities including Agni, Indra, Varuna, Soma, Surya, etc. see: Avari 2007 , p. 77.
  149. Prasad 2020 , p. 151.
  150. Original text translated in English: The Rig Veda , Mandala 10, Hymn 117, Ralph T.H. Griffith (Translator);
    C Chatterjee (1995), Values in the Indian Ethos: An Overview , Journal of Human Values, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3–12
  151. Michael Witzel, The Rigvedic religious system and its central Asian and Hindukush antecedents , in The Vedas – Texts, Language and Ritual, Editors: Griffiths and Houben (2004), Brill Academic, ISBN 978-9069801490 , pp. 581–627
  152. (from sāman, the term for a melody applied to a metrical hymn or a song of praise, Apte 1965 , p. 981.
  153. Witzel, M., " The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools : The Social and Political Milieu " in Witzel 1997 , pp. 269–270
  154. M Bloomfield, Rig-veda Repetitions , p. 402, at Google Books , pp. 402–464
  155. For 1875 total verses, see the numbering given in Ralph T. H. Griffith. Griffith's introduction mentions the recension history for his text. Repetitions may be found by consulting the cross-index in Griffith pp. 491–499.
  156. Annette Wilke and Oliver Moebus (2011), Sound and Communication: An Aesthetic Cultural History of Sanskrit Hinduism, Walter de Gruyter, ISBN 978-3110181593 , p. 381
  157. Michael Witzel (2003), "Vedas and Upaniṣads", in The Blackwell Companion to Hinduism (Editor: Gavin Flood), Blackwell, ISBN 0-631215352 , pp. 76–77
  158. The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools , Michael Witzel, Harvard University
  159. Autochthonous Aryans? Michael Witzel, Harvard University
  160. Early Sanskritization Archived 20 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine , Michael Witzel, Harvard University
  161. Antonio de Nicholas (2003), Meditations Through the Rig Veda: Four-Dimensional Man, ISBN 978-0595269259 , pp. 273–274
  162. Witzel, M., " The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools : The Social and Political Milieu " in Witzel 1997 , pp. 270–271
  163. Witzel, M., " The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools : The Social and Political Milieu " in Witzel 1997 , pp. 272–274
  164. Paul Deussen , Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120814684 , pp. 217–219
  165. Michaels 2004 , p. 52 Table 3
  166. CL Prabhakar (1972), The Recensions of the Sukla Yajurveda, Archív Orientální, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp. 347–353
  167. Paul Deussen , The Philosophy of the Upanishads , Motilal Banarsidass (2011 Edition), ISBN 978-8120816206 , p. 23
  168. Patrick Olivelle (1998), Upaniṣhads, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-282292-6 , pp. 1–17
  169. Michaels 2004 , p. 56.
  170. Frits Staal (2009), Discovering the Vedas: Origins, Mantras, Rituals, Insights, Penguin, ISBN 978-0143099864 , pp. 136–137
  171. Frits Staal (2009), Discovering the Vedas: Origins, Mantras, Rituals, Insights, Penguin, ISBN 978-0143099864 , p. 135
  172. Alex Wayman (1997), Untying the Knots in Buddhism, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120813212 , pp. 52–53
  173. "The latest of the four Vedas, the Atharva-Veda, is, as we have seen, largely composed of magical texts and charms, but here and there we find cosmological hymns which anticipate the Upanishads, – hymns to Skambha, the 'Support', who is seen as the first principle which is both the material and efficient cause of the universe, to Prāna, the 'Breath of Life', to Vāc, the 'Word', and so on." Zaehner 1966 , p. vii.
  174. Flood 1996 , p. 37.
  175. Laurie Patton (2004), Veda and Upanishad, in The Hindu World (Editors: Sushil Mittal and Gene Thursby), Routledge, ISBN 0-415215277 , p. 38
  176. Jan Gonda (1975), Vedic Literature: Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas, Vol 1, Fasc. 1, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3447016032 , pp. 277–280, Quote: "It would be incorrect to describe the Atharvaveda Samhita as a collection of magical formulas".
  177. Kenneth Zysk (2012), Understanding Mantras (Editor: Harvey Alper), Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120807464 , pp. 123–129
  178. On magic spells and charms, such as those to gain better health: Atharva Veda 2.32 Bhaishagykni, Charm to secure perfect health Maurice Bloomfield (Translator), Sacred Books of the East, Vol. 42, Oxford University Press; see also chapters 3.11, 3.31, 4.10, 5.30, 19.26;
    On finding a good husband: Atharva Veda 4.2.36 Strijaratani Maurice Bloomfield (Translator), Sacred Books of the East, Vol. 42, Oxford University Press; Atharvaveda dedicates over 30 chapters to love relationships, sexuality and for conceiving a child, see e.g. chapters 1.14, 2.30, 3.25, 6.60, 6.78, 6.82, 6.130–6.132; On peaceful social and family relationships: Atharva Veda 6.3.30 Maurice Bloomfield (Translator), Sacred Books of the East, Vol. 42, Oxford University Press;
  179. Kenneth Zysk (1993), Religious Medicine: The History and Evolution of Indian Medicine, Routledge, ISBN 978-1560000761 , pp. x–xii
  180. Witzel, M., " The Development of the Vedic Canon and its Schools : The Social and Political Milieu " in Witzel 1997 , pp. 275–276
  181. Moriz Winternitz (2010), A History of Indian Literature, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120802643 , pp. 175–176
  182. Klostermaier 1994 , p. 67.
  183. Max Müller, Chandogya Upanishad , The Upanishads, Part I, Oxford University Press, p. lxxxvii with footnote 2
  184. Paul Deussen, Sixty Upanishads of the Veda, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120814684 , p. 63
  185. The Development of the Female Mind in India , p. 27, at Google Books , The Calcutta Review, Volume 60, p. 27
  186. Jan Gonda (1975), Vedic Literature: (Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas), Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3447016032 , pp. 319–322, 368–383 with footnotes
  187. AB Keith (2007), The Religion and Philosophy of the Veda and Upanishads, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120806443 , pp. 489–490
  188. Max Müller, The Upanishads , Part 1, Oxford University Press, p. lxxxvi footnote 1
  189. Mahadevan 1956 , p. 59.
  190. PT Raju (1985), Structural Depths of Indian Thought, State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0887061394 , pp. 35–36
  191. WD Strappini, The Upanishads , p. 258, at Google Books , The Month and Catholic Review, Vol. 23, Issue 42
  192. Wiman Dissanayake (1993), Self as Body in Asian Theory and Practice (Editors: Thomas P. Kasulis et al), State University of New York Press, ISBN 978-0791410806 , p. 39; Quote: "The Upanishads form the foundations of Hindu philosophical thought and the central theme of the Upanishads is the identity of Atman and Brahman, or the inner self and the cosmic self.";
    Michael McDowell and Nathan Brown (2009), World Religions, Penguin, ISBN 978-1592578467 , pp. 208–210
  193. Patrick Olivelle (2014), The Early Upanisads, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0195352429 , p. 3; Quote: "Even though theoretically the whole of vedic corpus is accepted as revealed truth [shruti], in reality it is the Upanishads that have continued to influence the life and thought of the various religious traditions that we have come to call Hindu. Upanishads are the scriptures par excellence of Hinduism".
  194. Patrick Olivelle 1999 , p. xxiii.
  195. James Lochtefeld (2002), "Vedanga" in The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. 1: A–M, Rosen Publishing, ISBN 0-8239-2287-1 , pp. 744–745
  196. Annette Wilke & Oliver Moebus 2011 , pp. 391–394 with footnotes, 416–419.
  197. Harold G. Coward 1990 , pp. 105–110.
  198. The Encyclopædia Britannica: A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, Literature and General Informatio . Encyclopædia Britannica. 1911. p. 161 .
  199. Annette Wilke & Oliver Moebus 2011 , pp. 472–532.
  200. Harold G. Coward 1990 , p. 18.
  201. Rajendra Prasad (2009). A Historical-developmental Study of Classical Indian Philosophy of Morals . Concept. p. 147. ISBN 978-81-8069-595-7 .
  202. BR Modak, The Ancillary Literature of the Atharva-Veda, New Delhi, Rashtriya Veda Vidya Pratishthan, 1993, ISBN 81-215-0607-7
  203. Monier-Williams 2006 , p. 207. [1] Accessed 5 April 2007.
  204. Apte 1965 , p. 293.
  205. "Upaveda" . Oxford University Press . Retrieved 7 December 2014.
  206. Narayanaswamy, V. (1981). "Origin and Development of Ayurveda: A Brief History" . Ancient Science of Life. 1 (1): 1–7. PMC 3336651 . PMID 22556454 .
  207. Frawley, David; Ranade, Subhash (2001). Ayurveda, Nature's Medicin . Lotus Press. p. 11. ISBN 9780914955955 . Retrieved 6 January 2015.
  208. Paul Kuritz (1988), The Making of Theatre History, Prentice Hall, ISBN 978-0135478615 ,
    p. 68
  209. Sullivan 1994 , p. 385
  210. Sanskrit original: Chandogya Upanishad , Wikisource;
    English translation: Chandogya Upanishad 7.1.2 , G Jha (Translator), Oriental Book Agency, p. 368
  211. "Natyashastra" (PDF). Sanskrit Documents.
  212. Coormaraswamy and Duggirala (1917). The Mirror of Gesture . Harvard University Press. pp. 2–4.
  213. Goswami, Satsvarupa (1976), Readings in Vedic Literature: The Tradition Speaks for Itself, S.l.: Assoc Publishing Group, p. 240, ISBN 978-0-912776-88-0
  214. Greg Bailey (2001), Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy (Editor: Oliver Leaman), Routledge, ISBN 978-0415172813 , pp. 437–439
  215. Ludo Rocher (1986), The Puranas, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3447025225 , pp. 1–5, 12–21
  216. Nair, Shantha N. (2008). Echoes of Ancient Indian Wisdom: The Universal Hindu Vision and Its Edifice . Hindology Books. p. 266. ISBN 978-81-223-1020-7 .
  217. Ludo Rocher (1986), The Puranas, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, ISBN 978-3447025225 , pp. 12–13, 134–156, 203–210
  218. Greg Bailey (2001), Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy (Editor: Oliver Leaman), Routledge, ISBN 978-0415172813 , pp. 442–443
  219. Dominic Goodall (1996), Hindu Scriptures, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0520207783 , p. xxxix
  220. Thompson, Richard L. (2007). The Cosmology of the Bhagavata Purana 'Mysteries of the Sacred Universe . Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. p. 10. ISBN 978-81-208-1919-1 .
  221. Dominic Goodall (1996), Hindu Scriptures, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0520207783 , p. xli
  222. BN Krishnamurti Sharma (2008), A History of the Dvaita School of Vedānta and Its Literature, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120815759 , pp. 128–131
  223. Freschi 2012 , p. 62.
  224. Lipner 2012 , p. 16.
  225. Axel Michaels (2004), Hinduism: Past and Present, Princeton University Press, p.18; see also Julius Lipner (2012), Hindus: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices, Routledge, p.77; and Brian K. Smith (2008), Hinduism, p.101, in Jacob Neusner (ed.), Sacred Texts and Authority, Wipf and Stock Publishers.
  226. Lipner 2012 , p. 15-17.
  227. Muhammad Khalid Masud (2000). Travellers in Faith: Studies of the Tablīghī Jamāʻat as a Transnational Islamic Movement for Faith Renewal. BRILL. p. 50. ISBN 9789004116221 .
  228. Rambachan 1994 , p. 272.
  229. Nagappa 2011 , p. 283 ("It is said that the Varna system [...] Sanatan Hindu").
  230. Müller, Friedrich Max (author) & Stone, Jon R. (author, editor) (2002). The essential Max Müller: on language, mythology, and religion. Illustrated edition. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-312-29309-3 . Source: [2] (accessed: Friday May 7, 2010), p. 44
  231. "Rig Veda in UNESCO Memory of the World Register" .

Sources

Printed sources
Web-sources
  1. Vaman Shivaram Apte, The Practical Sanskrit–English Dictionary , see apauruSeya
  2. "astika" and "nastika" . Encyclopædia Britannica Online, 20 Apr. 2016

Further reading

Overviews
  • J. Gonda, Vedic Literature: Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas, A History of Indian literature. Vol. 1, Veda and Upanishads, Wiesnaden: Harrassowitz (1975), ISBN 978-3-447-01603-2 .
  • J.A. Santucci, An Outline of Vedic Literature, Scholars Press for the American Academy of Religion, (1976).
  • S. Shrava, A Comprehensive History of Vedic Literature – Brahmana and Aranyaka Works, Pranava Prakashan (1977).
Concordances
  • M. Bloomfield, A Vedic Concordance (1907)
  • Vishva Bandhu, Bhim Dev, S. Bhaskaran Nair (eds.), Vaidika-Padānukrama-Koṣa: A Vedic Word-Concordance, Vishveshvaranand Vedic Research Institute, Hoshiarpur, 1963–1965, revised edition 1973–1976.
Conference proceedings
  • Griffiths, Arlo and Houben, Jan E.M. (eds.), The Vedas : texts, language & ritual: proceedings of the Third International Vedic Workshop, Leiden 2002, Groningen Oriental Studies 20, Groningen : Forsten, (2004), ISBN 90-6980-149-3 .

External links